THE FAMILY BUSINESS GETS A LITTLE BIGGER WITH CONFIRMED CASTING FOR UPCOMING WAYWARD SISTERS EPISODE OF SUPERNATURAL

obsessionisaperfume:

winjennster:

elizabethrobertajones:

· A new member of the Wayward Sisterhood is the character Patience Turner (Clark Backo – Designated Survivor), a high school over-achiever whose life is turned upside down when she discovers she’s a powerful psychic, a gift she inherited from her estranged grandmother (and season one Supernatural character) Missouri Moseley. Hunted by dark forces for her power, Patience finds refuge with Jody and her wayward family.

Patience TURNER? Like Rufus Turner???

RIGHT???

· In addition to the Wayward Sisters casting, it was also announced that Lawrence, Kansas psychic Missouri Moseley (played by Loretta Devine – The Carmichael Show), who made a memorable appearance as a Winchester family friend in the season one episode “Home,” will also return to Supernatural this season, in an episode to be announced later.

THE FAMILY BUSINESS GETS A LITTLE BIGGER WITH CONFIRMED CASTING FOR UPCOMING WAYWARD SISTERS EPISODE OF SUPERNATURAL

archiemcphee:

From now on we will only drink our coffee served in ice cream cones dipped in chocolate and coated in sprinkles, lots of sprinkles. That’s precisely what’s on the menu at a cafe in Tokyo called Coffee Cone.

image

First you drink the coffee and then you get to eat the cup. It’s brilliant!

Follow Coffee Cone on Instagram or Facebook for more photos of #coffeeinacone.

image

Photos by takeyan9, yzpon2, mote_e, gallois25, yuuuri_mi, tukanana, and ayana0727ayana respectively.

[via My Modern Met]

bilt2tumble:

brainstatic:

“I shouldn’t have to pay for other people’s healthcare” yeah, no, you should. We’re all soft, weak, hairless apes long removed from any species that could survive alone, and you’re alive because of the daily efforts a vast web of people just as weak and helpless as you. That’s what a society is. America requires you to pay extraordinarily little to the common good, but keeping your fellow witless apes alive is part of the small fee. Deal with it or try your luck in the wilderness.

… The deep-DEEP Wilderness. Like, where, if you fall & brake your leg, then manage to drag yourself back to your cabin for your radio, Search & Rescue can ask: ‘Why should we have to spend a shit-ton of money to helicopter out there and save your ass?’ Then you can consider humbly begging for help or sticking to your principles and possibly dying of thirst/starving to death in your cabin

The thing is:  you already are paying for other people’s healthcare.  

Every time you pay a hospital bill or pay the deductible on a doctor’s visit?  You’re paying for someone else’s care.  

Every outpatient clinic and private practice carries a certain percentage of patients who cannot pay.  Licensed practitioners are held to state ethics for their profession, which often specifies that you can’t simply turn away people with acute medical needs.  Many outpatient clinics that are part of a larger system are held to a institutional culture that you share the burden and take on as much unpaid care as your department can bear.  

Hospitals cannot turn away people if they’re experiencing a medical emergency, regardless of ability to pay.  They can’t discharge someone unless they have a minimally safe discharge plan.  Patients wait for days, weeks, and sometimes months before they can be transferred to a psychiatric facility or nursing home if they can’t go home.  

You know what people are recommended to do if they have an elderly or disabled family member that they can’t care for and can’t find a placement for?  Abandon your family member in an emergency room.  The hospital will have to care for them until a nursing home Medicaid or Medicare bed is found.  Surprise, surprise, it’s quicker and easier for hospitals to find those beds.

Where do you think that cost goes?  How do you think hospitals and medical practices calculate their fees?  We all share the burden of unpaid medical bills already, even in a “free market” model of health care.  It’s just that “free market” forces ratchet up the price because people who can’t pay end up waiting until it IS an emergency before seeking out care.  And then it costs a heck of a lot more than preventative care.  In the current set up, that’s what the market will bear.

Health Care: Were The Risks Of Repeal Without Replace Too High?

While McConnell and Trump called this plan a straight repeal of the Affordable Care Act, it would in fact have left many parts of the law in place. That is because under Senate rules, legislators can only repeal the parts of the law that have a budget or tax impact.

What would be repealed:

  • federal Medicaid expansion funding – phased out over two years.
  • Premium tax credits and cost-sharing subsidies
  • individual mandate to get insurance coverage
  • Employer mandate
  • coverage of Planned Parenthood services (will end up being blocked for 1 year)
  • the taxes on corporations and the wealthy (would add up to $631 billion in tax cuts over 10 years)

What would stay:

  • Can get insurance under parents’ plans up to 26 years old
  • Insurance companies still mandated to accept all applicants regardless of health status
  • 10 ACA mandated essential health benefits remain in place
  • Mental health coverage remains as one of the 10 essential health benefits. 

Possible changes:

  • Medicaid services or payments to nursing homes and for services to people with disabilities could be cut to compensate for the decline in federal funding of Medicaid
  • Eight states have a “trigger clause” dropping Medicaid expansion immediately if federal matching rate declines “below the ACA-promised rates”
  • Mental health coverage prices likely to go up, because only those who need mental health coverage likely to purchase mental health plans.

CBO’s estimate of effects:

  • “Premiums on the exchange would increase 20 percent to 25 percent the year after enactment” – double within 10 years.
  • “roughly 10 percent of the population would live in areas where there would not be any insurer in the individual market.”
  • “32 million people would lose health insurance by 2026″ 

Health Care: Were The Risks Of Repeal Without Replace Too High?

Why is Mitch McConnell still calling for a health-care vote? – The Washington Post

hearseeno:

“There are no longer any good outcomes for McConnell — politically speaking. There are bad ones and less bad ones. And putting the onus on other senators means there will be more blame to go around when all of it comes to an end.”

The effort to “repeal and immediately replace” Obamacare “will not be successful,” McConnell admitted. In its place in the coming days, he would call for a vote to open debate on the House-passed bill — unpopular among most senators — with the aim of amending that bill with the straight-up repeal bill that his more conservative members desire.

He was giving the conservatives the chance to vote on a straight-up repeal. But first they would have to record their vote for a House bill they loathe. 

[with no guarantees that the amendments attached to the bill as a result of the open debate will be the ones they want – a repeal amendment that may not pass versus other possible amendments that could pass]

It’s all about shifting blame.  If ultraconservatives vote “no” = no debate, McConnell can put the blame on their shoulders.  If the ultraconservatives vote “yes” = start a debate on the House bill, they are potentially back in business if enough moderates vote “yes,” too.  Either way, McConnell has given himself options for finger-pointing and lessening the effect of his failure on his power.

Why is Mitch McConnell still calling for a health-care vote? – The Washington Post